<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Adventures of Chris Schultz &#187; salesforce.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisschultz.net/tag/salesforcecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisschultz.net</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chris Schultz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>$125 Million Doesn&#8217;t Even Buy a Unique Logo Anymore</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schultz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic-design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo-design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salesforce.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been widely reported that Conde Nast launched their new $125 million dollar brand today, Portfolio.com. Clearly, they are putting the resources behind it that they think are necessary to ensure its success. The logo had a familiar look to it when I checked it out this morning. I guess for that kind of money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchrisschultz.net%2F2007%2F04%2F16%2F125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchrisschultz.net%2F2007%2F04%2F16%2F125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img align="left" alt="logos.jpg" id="image184" title="logos.jpg" src="http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/logos.jpg" />It&#8217;s been <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/003536.php">widely</a> <a href="http://www.jossip.com/gossip/conde-nast-portfolio/the-obnoxious-biz-glossy-from-conde-nast-is-here-20070416.php?rss">reported</a> <a href="http://www.dealbreaker.com/2007/04/portfolio_lands_on_the_streets.php">that</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/business/media/16portfolio.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin">Conde Nast</a> launched their new $125 million dollar brand today, <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/">Portfolio.com</a>. Clearly, they are putting the resources behind it that they think are necessary to ensure its success. The logo had a familiar look to it when I checked it out this morning. I guess for that kind of money you don&#8217;t get your own unique logo anymore, but you do get the best rip-off of <a href="http://www.salesforce.com/form/trial/freetrial-developer.jsp">someone else&#8217;s</a> that money can buy. (I guess the italicized middle f is going to be the next big thing in graphic design.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

