Last Friday HB 597, the Angel Investor Credit Program was signed into law by Gov. Jindal.   I fully expect this incentive to have a major impact on the flow of early-stage risk capital in Louisiana, but its important that you understand it and get an early jump in it to be best positioned to benefit. Now its time to figure out what this means for you.

Here are the bullet points:

• A credit of 35% of the money invested by an accredited angel investor in a certified Louisiana business, credit delayed by 24 months
• Credits capped at $1 million per year and $2 million total per business.
• The total angel investor rebates are capped at $5 million.
• Credit is transferable.
• Program effective from Jan. 1, 2011, through July 1, 2015.

Beyond this, I have been getting some questions for clarification so I reached out to Erich Rapp at Kean Miller.  My questions and his responses are below.

1) The company has to be a Louisiana based company – can the investor be anywhere since it’s transferable?

It would appear that the investor could be from anywhere. I see no prohibition on out of state residents investing in Louisiana companies and I would not think that the La DED would object to having someone from another state invest in a Louisiana business.

2) Can the investor credit pass through to angel groups?

The credit can be earned by an individual or an “entity” such as the South Coast Angel Fund or Launch Pad Ignition. It could then be transferred to the owners of those angel investor groups or the benefits might be passed to those individuals automatically depending on the tax status of those entities

3) Does the 5m available prorate or is it first come first serve? What is the most opportune time to file?

The Act authorizes the La DED to determine the allocation method. They are expressly authorized to use a first come, first serve method, but it does not appear they are required to use that method. Anyone that wants the credits should probably get an application in as soon as the state will take such applications.

Have further questions? Did I miss something? Let me know in the comments.

We all know the talent pipeline is critical to the success of the tech community in New Orleans. After the storm Tulane was forced to cut their Computer Science program.  They are now working to bring it back online.  I reached out to Nicolas Altiero, Dean of the School of Science and Engineering to get a progress report.

1. After the storm, Tulane was forced to cut its engineering program, but has since brought it back online and is bringing degree programs back. Can you share a little about the progress and priorities for engineering?

Two engineering departments, Biomedical Engineering and Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, were never cut. These two departments have continued to offer excellent programs with high enrollment at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and both have very strong faculties that attract a high level of research funding.

There are task forces in place looking into several potential programs, including Computer Science, Geological Engineering, and Human Factors Engineering. Of these, the plan for Computer Science is the most developed at this point.

After Katrina, a new School of Science and Engineering was created and the two surviving engineering departments were merged into that School along with seven science departments: Cell and Molecular Biology, Chemistry, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Mathematics, Physics, and Psychology. The new school has continued to grow since Katrina and is now comprised of 160 faculty members, nearly 1700 undergraduate students, and over 400 graduate students. External research funding exceeds $20M per year.

The Department of Physics, which has a strong emphasis in the area of advanced materials, has changed its name to the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics and now offers an undergraduate degree program in Engineering Physics. We are in the process of creating an associated Institute for Materials Science and Engineering that will focus on research and graduate education.

2. What is the current status of the Computer Science program? Are Computer Science classes coming back online in the fall of 2011?

There will be at least two new computer science courses offered beginning in the fall of 2011, two more in the spring of 2012, and additional new courses will be added the following year. At the outset, a program in Computer Science will be established and it is anticipated that an undergraduate “coordinate major” will be available within the next two years.

3. When are you targeting for the first undergraduate CS class? Are there plans for a graduate program?

The longer term plan is for a full undergraduate major within five years. We are also looking at the feasibility of establishing a formal Department of Computer Science within that time frame that offers undergraduate and graduate programs and is highly research active.

4. With the focus at the state level on digital media / tech companies, there is a tremendous demand for engineering / computer science talent locally. How does this impact priorities with the CS program at Tulane?

There are many factors that are driving our efforts to establish a strong computer science department at Tulane and the impact on the regional economy is certainly one of them.

5. What can the startup & tech community in New Orleans do to support your efforts in bringing the engineering school back to capacity and bringing the CS program back to Tulane?

The biggest factor in developing a Department of Computer Science will be resources. It will be very expensive to do it right. Tuition and research funding will be major sources of revenue but programs at private schools such as Tulane are highly dependent on fundraising and endowments. We plan to spend a great deal of time in the coming years seeking support for this program from alumni, friends, and industry and any help that we can get in promoting this effort and in contributing to it will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you to Dean Altiero for doing this interview.  I plan to continue this interview series with the other major regional engineering programs.  If you have questions I should ask or feedback, please let me know in the comments.

I got a chance to reconnect with Erik Hersman at SXSW & FOWA. He was on a great panel called Africa 2.0. I interviewed him about the site he helped create called Ushahidi.com to track the violence in Kenya surrounding the recent elections.

Erik Hersman – Ushahidi Interview from Chris Schultz on Vimeo.

Congratulations to Erik on all he is doing, I encourage you to visit Ushahidi.com and get involved. More about Erik can be found at WhiteAfrican and Afrigadget. As a fellow african-american, (born in Nigeria, raised in Kenya), the violence in Kenya has been very upsetting and I really appreciate all the effort that Erik (Hash) is making.

Last week at SXSW, I often found myself in conversations, and being asked about our Russian development team, Flatsourcing.com. I’d like to take in this post to tell the story behind our partnership with the team at Flatsourcing.

I’ve been working with Oleg for almost 5 years now. He was the a project manager on the creation our first website, BachelorBlowOut.com, and we’ve been working together ever since. We met through eLance, the same way that many outsourcing relationships get started. And over the last five years we’ve grown to be business partners in every sense of the word. The growth of both our businesses has been directly correlated, and we’ve developed an interdependent and symbiotic business partnership.

At this time last year I took a trip to Kazan, Russia, to meet Oleg and his partners Timur and Alex for the first time. This was incredibly enlightening experience for me. in addition to the wonderful cultural exchange that took place, we were able to solidify the partnership between our companies. Since that time our business is taken off together and we’ve become a fully integrated team, albeit separated by thousands of miles.

I’ve always felt that we’ve had a very fortunate experience with our outsourcing partners, but over the years we worked very hard to build a partnership that works. I’d like to share some of the things that make our outsourcing partnership so successful:

1. Trust - it takes time to develop the level of trust with your outsourcing partner that I’m describing above. But it’s important to take steps in that direction right from the start. This means putting systems in place to provide checks and balances for both parties for everything involved: financial transactions, deadlines, specifications, quality assurance, and communication flow. The more you put systems and best practices in place the better the level of trust you be able to establish. Our goal has always been to completely trust and empower our team in Russia, so that we don’t need to track their hours or remind them of deadlines. As we build trust on both sides of the outsourcing relationship the performance and execution has risen dramatically.
2. Respect - Another primary factor in the evolution of our partnership has been the respect with which we treat one another. A lot of people get in outsourcing relationships looking for the lowest cost provider. I believe low expectations result from looking for low-cost, and with low expectations comes poor quality results. We set high standards for the quality of our outsourced work and we have full faith that our team is capable of doing everything we ask of them. And we are treated with the highest respect by our team in Russia, deadlines are met, communications are answered, and our expectations are always exceeded.
3. Team - I believe getting outsourcing to work well is simple: do everything you would do if your outsourcing team was sitting in the office with you. Treat them as employees, empower them as business partners. Always treat them as if they were part of the team. That’s been the number one key to our success.

In addition to being prompted to write this post by the questions I received at SXSW, we also wanted to celebrate a shared success with our Flatsourcing team. Posted below is a Russian TV interview with the guys from Flatsourcing.com. enjoy getting our team and if you add any questions about outsourcing or Flatsourcing, give us a shout.

Today we are pleased to inaugurate a new interview series on the Idea Fuel blog. A few weeks ago, as I was digging in deep on Y Combinator, I mentioned that I thought Thinkature was the coolest of the current crop of Y Combinator companies. Jon Chambers from Thinkature and I traded a few emails back and forth and they agreed to answer some questions for an interview to be posted here. We really appreciate their effort and are excited to share their comments.

Jon Chambers and Drew Harry are Thinkature. In our interview they talk about establishing their own identity outside of Y Combinator, what sources of traffic convert the best, and why Web 2.0 is simply a temporal designation.

1. What is Thinkature?

Thinkature is a collaboration tool that brings the richness of in-person, visual communication to the web by placing instant messaging inside a visual workspace. It runs inside a web browser (with no extensions or plugins) and allows anybody with a connection to the Internet to communicate in real time via chat, by moving objects around in a workspace, and by adding pictures to express complex ideas.

2. Where did the idea for Thinkature begin? Is it something you started for fun, or did you set out to meet a specific need?

Y Combinator had been something we thought about doing since its first summer. We actually submitted an idea to the first session, but got turned down. After that, we continued to let ideas ferment, and submitted two of them to the second round of Y Combinator (Winter, 2005). Paul Graham wasn’t excited about either of our ideas, but wanted us to come in for an interview anyway. We had about 4 days to come up with something new, so we just started brainstorming from scratch. The Thinkature concept came out of us thinking about activities that we did a lot offline that weren’t effectively supported online.

3. Is Thinkature your full-time job? If not, do you hope one day it will be?

Thinkature is Jon’s full time job, but Drew is primarily a student at the MIT Media Lab.

4. If you have more than one person working on Thinkature, can you describe your team for us? How many people do you have? What are your backgrounds? Were you looking for any body in particular (i.e. creatives, hard-core developers, etc.)?

We lived together for our first two years at Olin College, so it was more of a situation of starting with a team and looking for a project. We knew we worked and lived well together, so it made sense to do a startup together. We both do more or less the same things – design, development, testing, community relations, etc. The biggest division is that Drew works mostly on the server-side technology, and Jon does the client. Though, Jon’s been filling in on the server side these days too.

We’re don’t really fit the stereotype of “web startup guys.” Neither of us has a serious computer science background, and we are (for the most part) as interested in understanding how people interact with technology as we are with how, for instance, our database interacts with the web server. We’ve got a diverse background that’s been really helpful for us. Jon’s a mechanical engineer by training and wrote a thesis about how we teach the American Civil War in different parts of the United States. Drew has an electrical engineering background and worked on an anthropology thesis.

5. Thinkature is a Y Combinator company. Did you submit during the winter or summer funding round? How has it changed your life being a Y Combinator funded company?

We were accepted during the second Y Combinator round, but wanted to finish our degree off before starting, so we were really involved in the third Y Combinator round (summer). Y Combinator was most helpful for us because it catalyzed our ideas, focused our energy, and gave us milestones to work towards. They also provided a community of founders to bounce ideas off of, commiserate with, and have dinner with once a week.

There are also some downsides to being a Y Combinator company. We’ve found that people often identify us as a Y Combinator startup before identifying us by our own merits. That’s been making it a little difficult for us to build our own brand, since commentary about us tends to also be about Y Combinator in a way that doesn’t seem to happen with other investors. You can see this in action on the reddit post about Thinkature’s launch. One of the threads is a complaint about Y Combinator, and the only thing the poster had to say about us other than our name was that we’re a Y Combinator company. Part of that is particular to Reddit, but being a Y Combinator company is a very real part of who we are and how people understand us.

6. What do the next 6 months look like for you? The next 2 years?

In the short term, our goals are to get Thinkature in front of as many people as possible and understand how they’re using it. From there, we’ll adapt to what our users want. We have a lot of really exciting ideas for improving Thinkature, but we’ll need more people to make the ideas real. We’ll be spending a lot of time in the next few months trying to build our team.

7. What are your most used/most requested features? Did this surprise you? (Did you think people would use Thinkature for one reason, and it turned out they use in a completely new way?)

The Thinkature you can use today is the lowest common denominator of a lot of different use cases we’ve talked about. So our hope was that when we released Thinkature, people would see very different possibilities in it. We’ve been thrilled to see that’s the case. A quick survey of the comments about Thinkature on del.icio.us reveals a wide variety of ways in which people have interpreted Thinkature. We’re thrilled about that. Looking at specific features, we’ve had a lot of requests for better text formatting, some smarter/more drawing features, and exporting.

Another interesting phenomenon is we’ve had a number of requests not to add more features. A lot of feature requests read something like “I’d like to see more line coloring options, but I know it would make the application more complicated, so it may be better just to leave it the way it is.” That’s music to our ears. We’re certainly going to continue to add features, but only when we’re really sure they’re executed well and fit with Thinkature’s overall vision.

8. Do you have any particular marketing strategies that you would like to share? Has something worked well for you?

Our users have had nice things to say about us, and that’s carried us a long way. We’ll be the first to admit that we haven’t devoted much energy to marketing, but it’s been going well for us thus far.

9. Can you share any usage or traffic stats? How quickly are you growing?

We’ve been really pleased with our growth. We’re not seeing enormous traffic, but then we never really expected that. New users are registering consistently, and we’re seeing well above 10% of our unique visitors registering for accounts. We’re seeing lots of users continue to come back day to day. Thinkature is a real part of a significant fraction of our users’ lives, which is more important to us than just getting hits.

There’s one other tidbit we’d like to share. We’ve been obsessively watching referrer logs, and we’ve gotten a lot of traffic from StumbleUpon. About a quarter of our total traffic came from them. The problem is that StumbleUpon traffic is cheap. That is to say that SU users (as far as we can tell) don’t tend to linger very long. We also had a radically lower conversation rate for users coming from StumbleUpon. The flip side of that is that getting written about on TechCrunch wasn’t nearly as good for traffic, but had a radically better conversion rate than traffic from anywhere else.

9. Can you share some obstacles you’ve faced along the way, or are still facing?

The server-side technology we’re using is, we think, fairly innovative. It’s been a real challenge to make lots of the networking things happen (we do things that web browsers were never really meant to do), but it’s also been immensely rewarding to see things come together.

Building large applications in JavaScript is also a fairly new practice. While there are lots of great communities growing, there’s precious little literature about things like best practices in application design and profiling. We’re trying to help that by writing about what we’ve learned in articles like one on profiling Javascript applications. Hopefully this will help build the state of the art in this area.

10. If it were all over tomorrow, what’s your of what accomplishment proudest so far?

The most gratifying part of Thinkature has been making something that people like. It’s an amazing feeling to see people from around the world appreciating something into which you’ve put 6 months of love and effort.

11. How would you define Web 2.0? Are you 2.0?

We feel like “Web 2.0″ is a temporal designation more than anything else. The term includes too many ideas ranging from usability to social software to business models to technologies. It’s become so overloaded that it doesn’t effectively exclude many modern web applications. Asking Flickr if they’re a Web 2.0 application is like asking Smashing Pumpkins if they’re a 90’s band. All the term Web 2.0 really does is describe a web application as being in a particular era. So yes, in the sense that Web 2.0 describes modern applications, we are Web 2.0. But we’re more different than we are similar to iconic sites like del.icio.us, Basecamp and Writely. We are an application that happens to share some technologies with web pages much more than we are a website that happens to behave somewhat like an application. That’s not to disparage more classical web applications – for some kinds of applications the web metaphor is quite appropriate. But for what we wanted to do, it just didn’t make sense. Also, see our longer response to this question on our blog.

12. What site(s) do you visit everyday other than your own? What Web apps/software are you currently using?

Drew: I use del.icio.us religiously to keep track of stuff I’m working on and keep up with friends. Our friends at alwaysBETA introduced me to newshutch.com for RSS reading. It’s not great (it’s got some frustrating encoding issues) but it’s better than Bloglines. I’m a huge Metafilter fan, too. It’s not really a web app, but as communities go it’s pretty excellent. That’s about it for me, other than various Mac apps I use. I’m pretty picky about committing to new sites.

Jon: Del.icio.us is fantastic. It’s also easy to forget that Gmail, which I use daily, is a web app. I aggregate content from a really wide range of sources including NPR, Penny Arcade, Ars Technica, CNN, WorldChanging, Reuters, and a ton of personal blogs.

***

I have personally used my Thinkature account to convey whiteboard-style communications to my team, and it has worked great for that. We really like it, consider ourselves users, and recommend that you check it out. Thanks to Jon and Drew for participating. We appreciate their insights and wish them the best of luck with Thinkature.

]]> http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/21/thinkaturecom-the-idea-fuel-interview/feed/ 2