<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Launch Lessons from Blake Haney on HumidBeings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chris Schultz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schultz</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/comment-page-1/#comment-85631</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/?p=612#comment-85631</guid>
		<description>Chris - great point about comments.  I like having the conversation here.  Is there any method for co-commenting?  I supposed trackbacks or RSS of comment feeds might make it possible.  This obviously is going to be platform dependent, but would be great to make it happen.

Thanks for taking the time to share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; great point about comments.  I like having the conversation here.  Is there any method for co-commenting?  I supposed trackbacks or RSS of comment feeds might make it possible.  This obviously is going to be platform dependent, but would be great to make it happen.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heuer</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/comment-page-1/#comment-85629</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/?p=612#comment-85629</guid>
		<description>Good points Chris - especially the one about choosing a competitor to knock off and in choosing a big one - this was one of the first lessons I learned from Guy Kawasaki&#039;s book Selling the Dream (I think it was that one).

I have one idea for Humid Beings, based on what we are doing with http://socialmediaclub.org/ and some experiences we have had with other aggregators.  I really feel, that if the creator is not getting directly compensated from a site (ie, being paid to produce original content) that they should be the beneficiary of the conversational traffic.  By this I mean, in the posts we are going to be aggregating form our members for our SMC site, we will be turning off comments on our site and directing them to the original post.  Ideally, we will be able to install something like co-comment and synchronize the display of all comments on both posts so the conversation can simultaneously co-exist in both places...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Chris &#8211; especially the one about choosing a competitor to knock off and in choosing a big one &#8211; this was one of the first lessons I learned from Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s book Selling the Dream (I think it was that one).</p>
<p>I have one idea for Humid Beings, based on what we are doing with <a href="http://socialmediaclub.org/" rel="nofollow">http://socialmediaclub.org/</a> and some experiences we have had with other aggregators.  I really feel, that if the creator is not getting directly compensated from a site (ie, being paid to produce original content) that they should be the beneficiary of the conversational traffic.  By this I mean, in the posts we are going to be aggregating form our members for our SMC site, we will be turning off comments on our site and directing them to the original post.  Ideally, we will be able to install something like co-comment and synchronize the display of all comments on both posts so the conversation can simultaneously co-exist in both places&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schultz</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/comment-page-1/#comment-85625</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/?p=612#comment-85625</guid>
		<description>So folks, the gig is up.  I just handed off the twitter handle to Blake.  No more cybersquatting for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So folks, the gig is up.  I just handed off the twitter handle to Blake.  No more cybersquatting for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2009/02/12/humid-beings/comment-page-1/#comment-85617</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/?p=612#comment-85617</guid>
		<description>That is hilarious.  I am going to start cybersquatting for people.

I agree 100% with the &quot;if you build it, they will come&quot; comment.  For the success of any entrepreneurial idea, 1% lies in concepting and building, 99% lies in everything after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is hilarious.  I am going to start cybersquatting for people.</p>
<p>I agree 100% with the &#8220;if you build it, they will come&#8221; comment.  For the success of any entrepreneurial idea, 1% lies in concepting and building, 99% lies in everything after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

