<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $125 Million Doesn&#8217;t Even Buy a Unique Logo Anymore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chris Schultz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Logo Factor - Design Blog &#187; Rip offs, knock offs and downright skullduggery</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-18138</link>
		<dc:creator>The Logo Factor - Design Blog &#187; Rip offs, knock offs and downright skullduggery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comment-18138</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re always going on about people pinching ideas for logos (not a good idea). Seems the same thing is pretty common when it comes to web design and the like. The folks at Mashable have put together a list of the 7 Most Blatant Web 2.0 Rip Offs. Some pretty brazen stuff - there&#8217;s some links in the comments that are even more apparent. Meanwhile, Scot Smith illustrates how logo design contests are a very bad idea, for both designer and client alike. Matt Heerema discovers the darker side of logo template sites. And while getting burned for a fifty-buck template from some design clearing house isn&#8217;t so bad, how about when $125 million doesn&#8217;t buy a unique logo anymore. Even blog web site text isn&#8217;t immune anymore - though The Blog Herald gives some decent pointers on how to detect when you stuff has been pinched. Jeebus. It&#8217;s a jungle out there&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re always going on about people pinching ideas for logos (not a good idea). Seems the same thing is pretty common when it comes to web design and the like. The folks at Mashable have put together a list of the 7 Most Blatant Web 2.0 Rip Offs. Some pretty brazen stuff &#8211; there&#8217;s some links in the comments that are even more apparent. Meanwhile, Scot Smith illustrates how logo design contests are a very bad idea, for both designer and client alike. Matt Heerema discovers the darker side of logo template sites. And while getting burned for a fifty-buck template from some design clearing house isn&#8217;t so bad, how about when $125 million doesn&#8217;t buy a unique logo anymore. Even blog web site text isn&#8217;t immune anymore &#8211; though The Blog Herald gives some decent pointers on how to detect when you stuff has been pinched. Jeebus. It&#8217;s a jungle out there&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Kurnosov</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7104</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Kurnosov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comment-7104</guid>
		<description>Well, let&#039;s wait and see who it was)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s wait and see who it was)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dusome</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dusome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....I&#039;d bet whoever is behind is the one holding up the post, eh Oleg?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.I&#8217;d bet whoever is behind is the one holding up the post, eh Oleg?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Kurnosov</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Kurnosov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comment-7009</guid>
		<description>Yes, what&#039;s the score?) We&#039;re too keeping eye on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, what&#8217;s the score?) We&#8217;re too keeping eye on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dusome</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-6985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dusome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2007/04/16/125-million-doesnt-even-buy-a-unique-logo-anymore/#comment-6985</guid>
		<description>How about an update on the Blake v. Chris competition!  What&#039;s the latest score guys!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about an update on the Blake v. Chris competition!  What&#8217;s the latest score guys!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

