<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone is figuring out that Y Combinator has it figured out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chris Schultz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schultz</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, Clearly I am making a generalization, you&#039;re right.  And though the barriers to company creation have never been lower, there will always be the need for serious funding for technologies that can&#039;t be hacked together on RedBull and pizza money.  I guess the point I was trying to make is that silly money isn&#039;t being thrown at projects that are 2-3 month creations, because the capital needs are much better understood from the VC perspective.  The Y combinator model shows a clear understanding of what funding is required to build proof of concept ventures.  To get them off the ground will require follow up funding.  

I definitely agree with your business model comment.  A lot of work can go into a project hoping that it can be integrated as a feature into Google&#039;s next initiative, but this is a highly risky business plan.  You have to have the best feature, be in the right place at the right time, and if you get passed over, you&#039;re stuck holding a bag of nothing.  Basically, you are not in control of your own destiny if you don&#039;t have a plan to monetize your service.  We learned this lesson the hard way with Huckabuck.com.  

Thanks for your comments Mark, I appreciate them and your readership.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, Clearly I am making a generalization, you&#8217;re right.  And though the barriers to company creation have never been lower, there will always be the need for serious funding for technologies that can&#8217;t be hacked together on RedBull and pizza money.  I guess the point I was trying to make is that silly money isn&#8217;t being thrown at projects that are 2-3 month creations, because the capital needs are much better understood from the VC perspective.  The Y combinator model shows a clear understanding of what funding is required to build proof of concept ventures.  To get them off the ground will require follow up funding.  </p>
<p>I definitely agree with your business model comment.  A lot of work can go into a project hoping that it can be integrated as a feature into Google&#8217;s next initiative, but this is a highly risky business plan.  You have to have the best feature, be in the right place at the right time, and if you get passed over, you&#8217;re stuck holding a bag of nothing.  Basically, you are not in control of your own destiny if you don&#8217;t have a plan to monetize your service.  We learned this lesson the hard way with Huckabuck.com.  </p>
<p>Thanks for your comments Mark, I appreciate them and your readership.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Seremet</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Seremet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Sweeping generalizations never fit.  I personally think it&#039;s cool that companies can get off the ground for 30K and some pizzas.  Having said that, I believe that serious technology creation doesn&#039;t normally come cheap and can include multiple disciplines.

We found it very hard to raise the capital required to build out our project in the beginning.  Fortunately, another investor and I were able to dump in the funding to get rolling.  Relatively speaking, it&#039;s an expensive project but it&#039;s also a defensible technology that can&#039;t be duplicated in a month by two guys in a basement.

Which brings me to the next point.  It seems that much of web 2 is simply feature sets for larger companies.  If you happen to be Y-C that&#039;s probably going to work out because 1 of 20 small investments will yield a huge return.  Unfortunately, if you happen to be the remaining 19 developing the next best sticky notes &amp; to do lists you&#039;re going to be disappointed.  Moreover, I don&#039;t think anyone should start a business (different from a hobby to create a site) without having an idea of how to monetize it.  Again, from an investor standpoint in this climate, this advice might fly but you better think about cash flow if you&#039;re a business person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweeping generalizations never fit.  I personally think it&#8217;s cool that companies can get off the ground for 30K and some pizzas.  Having said that, I believe that serious technology creation doesn&#8217;t normally come cheap and can include multiple disciplines.</p>
<p>We found it very hard to raise the capital required to build out our project in the beginning.  Fortunately, another investor and I were able to dump in the funding to get rolling.  Relatively speaking, it&#8217;s an expensive project but it&#8217;s also a defensible technology that can&#8217;t be duplicated in a month by two guys in a basement.</p>
<p>Which brings me to the next point.  It seems that much of web 2 is simply feature sets for larger companies.  If you happen to be Y-C that&#8217;s probably going to work out because 1 of 20 small investments will yield a huge return.  Unfortunately, if you happen to be the remaining 19 developing the next best sticky notes &amp; to do lists you&#8217;re going to be disappointed.  Moreover, I don&#8217;t think anyone should start a business (different from a hobby to create a site) without having an idea of how to monetize it.  Again, from an investor standpoint in this climate, this advice might fly but you better think about cash flow if you&#8217;re a business person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Chambers</title>
		<link>http://chrisschultz.net/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris-schultz-stage.flatsourcing.com/2006/11/10/everyone-is-figuring-out-that-y-combinator-has-it-figured-out/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hi there!

Thanks for the kind words -- we&#039;re really thrilled that you like Thinkature.  Please don&#039;t hesitate to drop us a line if you&#039;d like to chat.

Thanks!

-Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words &#8212; we&#8217;re really thrilled that you like Thinkature.  Please don&#8217;t hesitate to drop us a line if you&#8217;d like to chat.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

